All over the world there is a struggle taking place within and about religion. Sometimes it results merely in harsh or prejudicial words. Too often it erupts in violence and acts of shocking extremism. The essence of the struggle is this: are people of religious faith prepared to regard those of a different faith with respect and dignity, and yes, even love; or do they rather regard them as enemies? Are they “open” to the other or “closed”? Do they want to live in harmony with those different from themselves?

In each of the main religions such a struggle is being waged everywhere. Because of the enormous importance of religion in the modern world, the outcome of such a struggle has immense implications for all of us – those from the major faiths and those of none.

Some people naturally want to say that the answer to this lies in the realm of politics; and of course politics has a crucial role to play. But it is clear that since the dimensions of this struggle are inevitably affected by religion itself, people of faith have to step forward and take responsibility. What is more, because those who are passionate about their faith do not want to act in contradiction to it, the argument in favour of the open approach has to go wider and deeper than simply asking people to behave nicely to one another. It has to address, full-on, the spiritual, theological and scriptural basis for mutual respect towards those who follow a different religious or spiritual path.

On 20 October 2010, largely unnoticed by the world, the UN general assembly unanimously passed a resolution declaring the first full week of each February the World Interfaith Harmony Week. The resolution, first proposed by King Abdullah II of Jordan, is unique in the annals of the UN because of its explicit mention of God (albeit in a way that does not exclude those who don’t ascribe to a religion) and because it promotes harmonious interfaith relations in a way that specifically draws attention to the scriptural and theological basis for such relations.

Obviously resolutions, no matter how well-meaning, do not by themselves alter the world; but this resolution does encourage people who believe in inter-religious harmony and mutual acceptance to challenge those whose narrow and often ignorant view of other religions leads to discord and division. It acknowledges that religious discourse on social behaviour is central to the way the 21st century develops.

More here

{ 0 comments }

In summer 2000, the Chautauqua Institution invited me to present a week’s lectures on the vitality of religious faith among Americans at the millennium. Shortly afterward, the talks were expanded into a book titled “The Future of Christian Faith in America” (Augsburg).
At the time, I intended to revisit the subject and provide a modest update 10 years into the new millennium. As it turns out, two celebrated political scientists have done that very thing in an ambitious new book, “American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us” (Simon & Schuster).
Robert D. Putnam of Harvard University is best known for his earlier book, “Bowling Alone” (Simon & Schuster), which revealed the erosion of community involvement among Americans. His co-author, David E. Campbell, is founding director of the Rooney Center for the Study of American Democracy at the University of Notre Dame.
The current fashion of books promoting atheism suggests an erosion of religious faith in America. In fact, the percentage of Americans worshiping weekly has held steady during the past decade at just less than 40 percent. By the measure of church attendance, Americans are actually more religious than Iranians and exceeded only by the citizens of Jordan, Indonesia, Poland, Egypt, Brazil and India.
Speaking at the Pew Foundation’s recent Forum on Religious and Public Life, held in Washington, Campbell acknowledged that the U.S. offers an unusual environment for religion inasmuch as it simultaneously combines three things: Americans are religiously devout, diverse and tolerant.
Acknowledging that the 1950s marked a high point of Americans’ religiosity, Campbell noted that, abetted by the sexual revolution of the 1960s, religious faith plummeted, prompting Time magazine to ask on its cover in 1966: “Is God Dead?”
Two aftershocks followed, Campbell told the conference: In the 1970s, when many Americans looked for a place where they could find moral certainty; then through the mid-1990s, when many Christians sought for that certainty in evangelical Protestantism. At the same time, Latino immigrants swelled the ranks of churchgoing Catholics.
Yet we have not returned to the religiosity of the 1950s. In the 1990s, more Americans began to tell pollsters that they had “no religion.” Putnam and Campbell reveal that “when you look at young people, it’s an even higher percentage, up to a quarter, maybe even a third of all young people today who say they have no religion.”
In recent decades, the authors note, there has also been a growth in both religious and political conservatism, but it has not produced polarization. Indeed, the great majority of religious Americans believe that those without faith can be good Americans and that those of other faiths can go to heaven. The great majority of Americans believe there is truth in other religions.
For me, the most surprising revelation in “American Grace” is that half of Americans regularly say grace before meals.

{ 0 comments }

Royalty management

January 20, 2011

A nine-member committee under the Chairmanship= of Major Emmanuel Owusu-Adansi (Rtd) of the National Communications Authority (NCA) has been formed to work out the modalities for the payment of royalties to musicians. Members of the committee are four representatives each from the Ghana Independent Broadcasters Association  and the Copyright Royalty Management Team (ICMT). The terms [...]

Read the full article →

British study links spread of faith to `believer gene’

January 20, 2011

A British university study suggests that people of strong faith can spread religion through a “believers’ gene” that is part of their DNA. Cambridge University economics professor Robert Rowthorn theorizes a “predisposition toward religion” in a paper published in “Proceedings of the Royal Society B,” a prestigious journal of Britain’s Royal Society of scientists. Rowthorn [...]

Read the full article →

why did the novel The Life of Pi deserve the Man Booker prize?

January 5, 2011
Read the full article →

Why is Booker T. Washington the most important man in history?

January 2, 2011

It’s for a History project… And I had to write about the most important person in the history, I need help because well… My brain is a mush right now

Read the full article →

who won the man booker prize this year?

December 30, 2010

who

Read the full article →

Who would like to see the old Booker back?

December 27, 2010

I was watching some old wrestling vids and saw the old Booker T. Man he was awesome. I’m tired of King Booker. How about you? CAN YOU DIG IT SUCKAAAAA????

Read the full article →